Darryl Burton v. David Shinn
Petitioner: Darryl D. Burton
Respondent: David Shinn
Case Number: 5:2017cv00216
Filed: February 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Presiding Judge: Josephine L. Staton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 27 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)
March 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/27/2017. (dts)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Darryl Burton v. David Shinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Darryl D. Burton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David Shinn
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?