Kevin Ezell v. Department of Rehabilitation et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Ezell
Defendant: Department of Rehabilitation, Edward Crespin, Peter Dawson and Yukiko Long
Case Number: 5:2017cv00222
Filed: February 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G Bernal
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Case should have been closed on entry dated 8/18/17 (Dkt. No. #28 ) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iva)
August 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MINUTE Order: (1) GRANTING Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. #22 ); and (2) Denying Plaintiffs Motion for Default (Dkt. Nos. #18 & #19 ) (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) For the reasons stated above, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment and GRANTS Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Should Plaintiff seek guidance on possible next steps, the Court directs him to the Pro Se Clinic, which provides information to people seeking to represent themselves in civil cases. The clinic has locations in Riverside, Santa Ana, and Los Angeles; the contact information for each of those locations is available at http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/?OpenDocument. (iva)
August 10, 2017 Filing 27 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. The Court finds Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings #22 ; and Plaintiffs Motions for Default #18 , #19 are appropriate for resolution without a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the Court vacates the hearing set on 8/14/2017. The motion stands submitted on the papers timely filed. Further, the Court also vacates the Scheduling Conference set for 8/14/2017. IT SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 26, 2017 Filing 26 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: The Scheduling Conference previously set for 7/31/2017 is hereby rescheduled to 8/14/2017 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 18, 2017 Filing 25 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 2 to 3 days, filed by Plaintiff Kevin Ezell. (ad)
July 14, 2017 Filing 24 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3 days, filed by Defendants Edward Crespin, Peter Dawson, Department of Rehabilitation, Yukiko Long.. (Wang, Kenneth)
July 13, 2017 Filing 23 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings #22 . The following error(s) was found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely.Incorrect event selected. The correct event is: "Motions and Related Filings" - Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (ad)
July 7, 2017 Filing 22 MEMORANDUM in Support Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendants Edward Crespin, Peter Dawson, Department of Rehabilitation, Yukiko Long. (Wang, Kenneth) Modified on 8/18/2017 (iva).
July 6, 2017 Filing 21 INITIAL DISCLOSURE filed by Defendants Edward Crespin, Peter Dawson, Department of Rehabilitation, Yukiko Long (Wang, Kenneth)
July 5, 2017 Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Kevin Ezell, re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Entry of Default against defendant Department of Rehabilitation #18 , REQUEST to Vacate #17 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment #19 served on 06/28/2017. (lwag)
June 21, 2017 Filing 19 MOTION for Default Judgment/Affidavit FRCP Rule 55(a) and (b) para (1) filed by plaintiff Kevin Ezell. (iva)
June 21, 2017 Filing 18 MOTION for Default Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(2) or (3) filed by plaintiff Kevin Ezell. (iva)
June 21, 2017 Filing 17 REQUEST to Vacate Order Setting Scheduling Conference to Allow Default Fed.R.Civ.P.12(A)(2) or (3) filed by plaintiff Kevin Ezell. (iva)
June 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Scheduling Conference set for 7/31/2017 at 11:00 AM. (gga)
June 1, 2017 Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Plaintiff's Request for Injunctive Relief filed by Defendants Edward Crespin, Peter Dawson, Department of Rehabilitation, Yukiko Long. (Wang, Kenneth)
June 1, 2017 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Defendants Edward Crespin, Peter Dawson, Department of Rehabilitation, Yukiko Long.(Wang, Kenneth)
May 8, 2017 Filing 13 COURT ORDERED AMENDED Summons #6 and Complaint #1 Service Process filed by plaintiff Kevin Ezell, served on Attorney General 5/3/2017. (ad)
April 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER (1) Denying as Moot Plaintiffs Motion to Quash Defendants Response (Dkt. No. #11 ); and (2) Ordering Plaintiff to Effect Service By Mail, by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Thus, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Defendants' response as moot, and ORDERS Plaintiff to effect proper service by mailing a copy of the Summons and Complaint, together with the acknowledgment of receipt form, to the address below: California Office of the Attorney General 300 S. Spring St. No. 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Failure to effect proper service as described in this Order may result in dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (see document for details). (dro)
April 4, 2017 Filing 11 QUASH Defendant's Response #10 Process Information filed by Plaintiff Kevin Ezell. (ad)
March 21, 2017 Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Defendants Edward Crespin, Peter Dawson, Department of Rehabilitation, Yukiko Long to Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #9 to Service of Process Information by Plaintiff (Wang, Kenneth)
March 6, 2017 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kevin Ezell, upon Defendants Edward Crespin served on 2/13/2017, answer due 3/6/2017; Peter Dawson served on 2/13/2017, answer due 3/6/2017; Yukiko Long served on 2/16/2017, answer due 3/9/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Joe Xavier, Director of Department of Rehabilitation, Xavier Becerra, State Attorney General and Edmund Brown, Governor of the State of California. (ad)
March 6, 2017 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Kevin Ezell Re Complaint #1 and Summons and other documents, service date not indicated. (ad)
February 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
February 6, 2017 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Edward Crespin, Peter Dawson, Department of Rehabilitation, and Yukiko Long. (jtil)
February 6, 2017 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
February 6, 2017 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil)
February 6, 2017 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kevin Ezell. (jtil)
February 6, 2017 Filing 2 NOTICE Notice Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Kevin Ezell. (jtil)
February 6, 2017 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Kevin Ezell against Defendants Edward Crespin, Peter Dawson, Department of Rehabilitation, Yukiko Long. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (jtil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kevin Ezell v. Department of Rehabilitation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Rehabilitation
Represented By: Kenneth Kai-Chun Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Crespin
Represented By: Kenneth Kai-Chun Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Dawson
Represented By: Kenneth Kai-Chun Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yukiko Long
Represented By: Kenneth Kai-Chun Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Ezell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?