Javier Ricardo Betancourt v. Martin Biter
Petitioner: Javier Ricardo Betancourt
Respondent: Martin Biter
Case Number: 5:2017cv00232
Filed: February 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O. Carter
Presiding Judge: Douglas F. McCormick
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Martin Biter against Javier Ricardo Betancourt Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 20 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Javier Ricardo Betancourt v. Martin Biter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Javier Ricardo Betancourt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Martin Biter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?