Leigh A. Rondilone v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Leigh A. Rondilone v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Leigh A. Rondilone v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Leigh A. Rondilone
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	5:2017cv00761
Filed:	April 20, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	R. Gary Klausner
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Stevenson
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 4, 2018	Filing 19 ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Awar d and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS ($5,600.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation, to include the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 18 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (gr) Modified on 1/4/2018 (gr).
December 8, 2017	Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, Related to: Order 16 IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned matter be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings in accordance therewith. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rh)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 4, 2018

Filing 19 ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Awar d and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS ($5,600.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation, to include the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). 18 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (gr) Modified on 1/4/2018 (gr).

December 8, 2017

Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, Related to: Order 16 IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned matter be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings in accordance therewith. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leigh A. Rondilone v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leigh A. Rondilone
Represented By:	Shanny J Lee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?