Theresa Brooke v. Dinesh Bhakta et al
Theresa Brooke |
Dinesh Bhakta and Kanchan Bhakta |
5:2017cv00996 |
June 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
Sheri Pym |
John F. Walter |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MINUTE (In Chambers): ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT'S ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Taking all of these factors into account, dismissal for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with various Court orders is w arranted. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED with prejudice. This Order shall constitute notice of entry of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Pursuant to Local Rule 58-6, the Court ORDERS the Clerk to treat this Order, and its entry on the docket, as an entry of judgment. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 19 PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSEOn June 9, 2017, the Court set a Status Conference for June 15, 2017 and counsel for plaintiff, Peter Kristofer Strojnik, was notified of date and time of the hearing. On June 15, 2017, notwithstanding M r. Strojniks failure to appear at the hearing, the Court vacated the dismissal of this action for the reasons stated on the record. At the hearing, and in the Courts June 15, 2017 Minute Order, the Court ordered Mr. Strojnik to notify the United Sta tes Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that the Court had vacated its order dismissing the action. In addition, the Court ordered Mr. Strojnik to file a declaration with this Court confirming that he had so notified the Ninth Circuit.Based on th e Courts review of the dockets in this action and the Ninth Circuit (Case No. 17-55827), it appears that Mr. Strojnik has failed to notify the Ninth Circuit that this Court vacated its dismissal and failed to file the Court-ordered declaration in thi s action. As a result, the Court orders Peter Kristofer Strojnik to show cause in writing by June 30, 2017 why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $750.00 for his violation of the Courts Order. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the imposition of sanctions.IT IS SO ORDERED. (sr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.