Jack Robert Smith v. Harry Oreol et al
Jack Robert Smith |
All the Hospital Staff, Jesse Henderson, Chelsea Lucas, Harry Oreol, Gabriel Prempeh, Jyotila Singh, Murad Wadsworth and Jian Zhang |
5:2017cv01135 |
June 9, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
John F. Walter |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 156 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. The Court now enters a full and final judgment in this action, against Plaintiff Jack Robert Smith and in favor of Defendant Jesse Henderson. As the prevailing party, Defendant Jesse Henderson is entitled to recover his costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv) |
Filing 104 JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter, Related to: R&R - Accepting Amended Report and Recommendations, 103 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 33 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: denying 28 MOTION for Default Judgment ; deferring ruling on 25 MOTION to Dismiss Case. (1) Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a proof of service w ith the Court after serving Defendant with the following: a. a copy of the summons and SAC; b. two copies of the notice and acknowledgment as set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure § 415.30(b);3 and c. a return envelope, postage prepaid, addressed to Plaintiff; and (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue an alias summons regarding Plaintiff's SAC. (dts) |
Filing 16 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER re Notice of Dismissal [Dkt. 15] by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, 1. Defendant Mercy Poulson be dismissed from the action; and 2. The Clerk of Court issue the summons regarding Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. Plai ntiff shall have ninety (90) days from the date of the Order to have defendant Henderson served with a copy of the summons and Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and to file a proof of service with the Court. (dts) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.