Gregorio J. Pangelinan v. Cynthia Entzel
Petitioner: Gregorio J. Pangelinan
Respondent: Cynthia Entzel
Case Number: 5:2017cv01144
Filed: June 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D. Early
Presiding Judge: Fernando M. Olguin
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge 14 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gregorio J. Pangelinan v. Cynthia Entzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cynthia Entzel
Represented By: Bradley Edward Marrett
Represented By: Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregorio J. Pangelinan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?