Sam Piro et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
Sam Piro and Shannon Piro |
Deputy Acosta, City of Victorville, County of San Bernardino, Deputy Craig, Does and Officer Reynolds |
5:2017cv01607 |
August 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S. Gutierrez |
Sheri Pym |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 JUDGMENT RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Court, upon consideration of all moving papers and exhibits and the opposition papers and exhibits, and after considering all arguments of counsel, this co urt finds that all claims arising out of plaintiff's Complaint fail and are summarily adjudicated in favor of defendants. THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; DEPUTY ANTO NIO ACOSTA; and DEPUTY NICHOLAS CRAIG, and against Plaintiffs SAM PIRO and SHANNON PIRO as to all causes of action in the Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint; and that Defendants COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; DEPUTY ANTONIO ACOSTA; and DEPUTY NICHOLAS CRAIG, be awarded their statutory costs as allowable by law, and may file a motion for an award of reasonable attorney's fees, if appropriate. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.