Lawrence J. Peck v. Swift Transportation Co. Arizona, LLC et al
| Lawrence J. Peck |
| Does and Swift Transportation Co. Arizona, LLC |
| 5:2017cv01695 |
| August 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Gail J. Standish |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. On September 15, 2017 Plaintiff Lawrence J. Peck (Plaintiff) filed a Motion to Remand (Motion). (Doc. No. 11.) On September 25, 2017, Defenda nt Swift Transportation Co. Arizona, LLC (Defendant) filed its opposition. (Doc. No.13.) Plaintiff filed his reply in support of the Motion on October 2, 2017. (Doc. No.14.). On October 11, 2017, this Court took the October 16, 2017 hearing on this m atter off calendar. (Doc. No. 18.) Having considered all papers filed in support of the Motion, the Court GRANTS the Motion in Part, and DENIES in part. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). For the reasons stated above, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Mot ion, but DENIES Plaintiffs request for attorneys fees. The Court thus REMANDS this matter to the California Superior Court for the County of Riverside, and Defendants Motion to Consolidate (Doc. No. 19.) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Remanded to Riverside Superior Court RIC 1411184. MD JS-6. (ab)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
