Joseph DeMatteo v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Joseph DeMatteo
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 5:2018cv00469
Filed: March 8, 2018
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: Shashi H. Kewalramani
Presiding Judge: George H. Wu
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 13, 2018 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. No later than September 24, 2018, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing why he has not complied with the Court's Case Management Order ("CMO") and why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (see order for further details) (hr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joseph DeMatteo v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph DeMatteo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?