Jacqueline Woods v. Storck USA L.P.
| Jacqueline Woods |
| Storck USA L.P. |
| 5:2018cv02409 |
| November 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Storck USA L.P. answer now due 1/28/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Storck USA L.P..(Attorney Teresa Harrold Michaud added to party Storck USA L.P.(pty:dft))(Michaud, Teresa) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel areencouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for details. (shb)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jacqueline Woods, (Marron, Ronald) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Storck USA L.P. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jacqueline Woods. (Marron, Ronald) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jacqueline Woods. (Marron, Ronald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22738609 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jacqueline Woods. (Attorney Ronald A Marron added to party Jacqueline Woods(pty:pla))(Marron, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jacqueline Woods v. Storck USA L.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Storck USA L.P. | |
| Represented By: | Anne M Kelts |
| Represented By: | Teresa Harrold Michaud |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jacqueline Woods | |
| Represented By: | Ronald A Marron |
| Represented By: | Michael T Houchin |
| Represented By: | Tania Babaie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
