Harold Boyd White, Sr. v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Harold Boyd White, Sr. |
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill |
5:2019cv00295 |
February 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen L Stevenson |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV19-295 KS on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Harold Boyd White, Sr.. (Kuntz, William) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Harold Boyd White, Sr., upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 3/4/2019, answer due 7/2/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to G. Ortega, Title Unknown,. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Carley Sase, Title Unknown,. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Unknown Signer, Title Unknown, on behalf of General Counsel,. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Case Management Orders were also served along with Complaint Documents (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipts)(Kuntz, William) |
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Francesco P Benavides added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Benavides, Francesco) |
Filing 9 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Plaintiff will file an appropriate proof of service within 30 days of the date of this Order. (see document for details) (hr) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (hr) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Harold Boyd White, Sr.. (Kuntz, William) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Harold Boyd White, Sr., identifying United States of America and Social Security Administration. (Kuntz, William) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Harold Boyd White, Sr.. (Kuntz, William) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Harold Boyd White, Sr.. (Kuntz, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Harold Boyd White, Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney William M Kuntz added to party Harold Boyd White, Sr.(pty:pla))(Kuntz, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.