Victor Sanchez v. S. Frauenheim
Victor Sanchez |
S. Frauenheim |
5:2019cv00304 |
February 19, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Return to Habeas Petition (2254) #8 (Attachments: #1 Lodgment 1 Part 1, #2 Lodgment 1 Part 2, #3 Lodgment 1 Part 3, #4 Lodgment 1 Part 4, #5 Lodgment 1 Part 5, #6 Lodgment 2 Part 1, #7 Lodgment 2 Part 2, #8 Lodgment 3, #9 Lodgment 4 Part 1, #10 Lodgment 4 Part 2, #11 Lodgment 4 Part 3, #12 Lodgment 5, #13 Lodgment 6, #14 Lodgment 7, #15 Lodgment 8, #16 Lodgment 9, #17 Lodgment 10, #18 Lodgment 11, #19 Lodgment 12, #20 Lodgment 13, #21 Lodgment 14)(Delgado-Rucci, David) |
Filing 8 Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 filed by Respondent S. Frauenheim. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus)(Delgado-Rucci, David) |
Filing 7 Mail Returned addressed to Victor Sanchez (OTC) re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas Corpus) - optional html form, #2 , Order Requiring Return/Answer to Petition,, #3 . (sbou) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney David Delgado-Rucci on behalf of Respondent S. Frauenheim (Attorney David Delgado-Rucci added to party S. Frauenheim(pty:res))(Delgado-Rucci, David) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned addressed to Victor Sanchez BB4957 Pleasant Valley State Prison PO Box 8500 CA, CA 93210 re Order Requiring Return/Answer to Petition,, #3 (sbou) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned addressed to Victor Sanchez BB9957 Pleasant Valley State Prison PO Box 8500 CA, CA 93210 re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-84) (Habeas Corpus) - optional html form, #2 (sbou) |
![]() |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth.(Filing fee $ 5:FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Victor Sanchez. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Victor Sanchez v. S. Frauenheim | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Victor Sanchez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: S. Frauenheim | |
Represented By: | David Delgado-Rucci |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.