Misael Romero v. John F. Scudder et al
| Misael Romero |
| NuLook Floors, John F. Scudder and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 5:2019cv00951 |
| May 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 12 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to John F. Scudder answer now due 7/3/2019, filed by Defendant John F. Scudder.(Attorney Zachary R Hagenbuch added to party John F. Scudder(pty:dft))(Hagenbuch, Zachary) |
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:19-cv-00951 DSF(RAOx). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, upon Defendant John F. Scudder served on 5/29/2019, answer due 6/19/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John F. Scudder by Jane Doe, Occupant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, upon Defendant NuLook Floors served on 5/29/2019, answer due 6/19/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon NuLook Floors by SI Do, Incharge in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants NuLook Floors, John F. Scudder. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Misael Romero, (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Misael Romero. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23782701 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Misael Romero. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Misael Romero(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
