Kulwinder Singh v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Kulwinder Singh |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, Timothy S. Robbins and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| 5:2019cv01024 |
| June 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Alka Sagar |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge David O. Carter, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #12 . THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that this action, No. CV 19-001024-DOC (ASx), is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees, including attorney fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (hr)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by defendants William P. Barr, Timothy S. Robbins, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Burrelle, Hillary) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Stipulation Extending Time for Respondent to File a Response to Petitioner's Motion for Emergency Stay of Removal #10 . Show Cause Hearing continued to 7/15/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. The Emergency Stay will remain in effect until the Court issues a ruling on the matter. (twdb)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Petitioner's Motion for Emergency Stay of Removal; Declaration of Hillary M. Burrelle filed by defendants William P. Barr, Timothy S. Robbins, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Burrelle, Hillary) |
| Filing 9 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter: The Show Cause Hearing Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue previously scheduled for 6/28/2019 @ 8:30 AM has been rescheduled. Show Cause Hearing set for 6/28/2019 @ 10:00 AM **TIME CHANGE ONLY** before Judge David O. Carter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 8
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY OF REMOVAL by Judge David O. Carter #6 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons set forth in the parties stipulation, that Respondent shall have up to and including June 24, 2019, to file a response to the Motion for Emergency Stay of Removal (Docket Entry No. 1). The Emergency Stay will remain in effect until the Court issues a ruling on the matter. (twdb)
|
| Filing 7 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter: The Show Cause Hearing Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue previously scheduled for 6/17/2019 @ 7:30 AM has been rescheduled. Show Cause Hearing set for 6/28/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY OF REMOVAL as to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1 filed by Defendants William P. Barr, Timothy S. Robbins, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Hillary Morgan Burrelle added to party William P. Barr(pty:res), Attorney Hillary Morgan Burrelle added to party Timothy S. Robbins(pty:res), Attorney Hillary Morgan Burrelle added to party U.S. Department of Homeland Security(pty:res), Attorney Hillary Morgan Burrelle added to party U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (pty:res))(Burrelle, Hillary) |
|
Filing 5
(IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SHOULD NOT ISSUE by Judge David O. Carter. The Court ORDERS Defendants to appear before this Court on June 17, 2019, at 7:30 a.m. to show cause why a preliminary injunction shall not issue to enjoin Defendants from removing Petitioner from the United States during the pendency of this case. The parties may file a stipulation obviating the need for a preliminary injunction hearing. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY OF REMOVAL by Judge David O. Carter. Within five days of the date of this Order (by no later than June 10, 2019), Respondent is ORDERED to file a Response to the Motion for Emergency Stay. The Emergency Stay will remain in effect until the Court issues a ruling on the matter. SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Kulwinder Singh. (Thompson, Rose) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. 0973-23861818 for $5 filing fee, filed by petitioner Kulwinder Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 CAR, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 Asylum Brazil) (Attorney Rose Marie Thompson added to party Kulwinder Singh(pty:pet))(Thompson, Rose) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
