Levecke Corporation v. Teamsters Local 630
| Levecke Corporation |
| Teamsters Local 630 |
| 5:2019cv01078 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Levecke Corporation answer now due 8/15/2019, re Counterclaim, #12 filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Respondent Levecke Corporation.(April, Szabo) |
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: re: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #15 . Due to clerical error the case was inadvertently closed and ordered reopened (JS-5). In light ofthe Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #15 the Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Petition #10 is deemed moot. (shb)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Levecke Corporation. Dismissal is without prejudice. (April, Szabo) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address ishttp://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for details. (shb)
|
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Renee Sanchez counsel for Counter Claimant Teamsters Local 630, Defendant Teamsters Local 630. Adding Renee Q. Sanchez as counsel of record for Teamsters Local 630 for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant/Cross-Petitioner Teamsters Local 630. (Attorney Renee Sanchez added to party Teamsters Local 630(pty:cc), Attorney Renee Sanchez added to party Teamsters Local 630(pty:dft))(Sanchez, Renee) |
| Filing 12 COUNTERCLAIM against Plaintiff/Cross-Respondent Levecke Corporation, filed by Defendant/Cross-Petitioner Teamsters Local 630. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Cross-Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award, #2 Exhibit B to Cross-Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award)(Kierig, Stephanie) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Teamsters Local 630, (Kierig, Stephanie) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Petition to Vacate Arbitrator's Decision filed by Defendant Teamsters Local 630. Motion set for hearing on 8/19/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration of Attorney Bradley S. Beherns in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #3 Declaration of Attorney Stephanie A. Kierig in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #4 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Attorney Stephanie Alexis Kierig added to party Teamsters Local 630(pty:dft)) (Kierig, Stephanie) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Levecke Corporation, upon Defendant Teamsters Local 630 served on 6/20/2019, answer due 7/11/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (April, Szabo) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Teamsters Local 630. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Levecke Corporation identifying N/A as Corporate Parent. (April, Szabo) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Levecke Corporation, identifying N/A. (April, Szabo) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Levecke Corporation. (April, Szabo) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Levecke Corporation. (April, Szabo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23910736 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Levecke Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Szabo L. April added to party Levecke Corporation(pty:pla))(April, Szabo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Levecke Corporation v. Teamsters Local 630 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Teamsters Local 630 | |
| Represented By: | Renee Sanchez |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Alexis Kierig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Levecke Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Szabo L. April |
| Represented By: | Szabo L April |
| Represented By: | L Brent Garrett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
