Rene E. Maphumulo v. Hugh William McEntyer et al
| Rene E Maphumulo |
| Swift Transportation Co., Inc., Swift Transportation Services, LLC, Swift Leasing Co., Swift Transportation, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc., Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Hugh William McEntyer and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive |
| 5:2019cv01109 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 [NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a) or (c), filed with no text] (Shaffer, Douglas) Modified on 3/24/2021 (twdb). |
Filing 31
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter:ORDER DISMISSING CIVILCASE. The Court, having been notified by counsel for the parties that this action has been settled re Notice of Settlement #30 , hereby orders this actionDISMISSED without prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in thecase VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court retains jurisdiction for thirty(30) days to vacate this order and reopen the action upon showing of good causethat the settlement has not been consummated. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on the parties. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 30 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Snyder, Barry) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER ON STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE TRIAL #28 by Judge David O. Carter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Final Pretrial Conference shall be extended from August 3, 2020 to October 5, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. 2. The jury trial shall be continued from August 18, 2020 to October 20, 2020., at 8:30 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
|
| Filing 28 Joint STIPULATION for Jury Trial on October 20, 2020 filed by Defendants Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Stipulation to Continue Trial)(Snyder, Barry) |
|
Filing 27
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Denying Stipulation to Continue #26 . DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT. (twdb)
|
| Filing 26 STIPULATION to Continue Trial from 08/18/2020 to 12/15/2020 Re: Pretrial-Trial Scheduling Order - form only, #19 filed by Defendants Swift Transportation Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Continue Trial)(Snyder, Barry) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #23 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE filed by defendant Hugh William McEntyer. Notice of Joinder to Removal of Action (Snyder, Barry) |
| Filing 23 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, filed by defendant Hugh William McEntyer.(Attorney Barry Clifford Snyder added to party Hugh William McEntyer(pty:dft))(Snyder, Barry) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #21 Request to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Matthew L Taylor terminated. (twdb)
|
| Filing 21 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Douglas D. Shaffer in place of attorney Matthew L. Taylor filed by Plaintiff Rene E Maphumulo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Request for Approval of Substitution or Withdrawal of Attorney) (Attorney Douglas Duran Shaffer added to party Rene E Maphumulo(pty:pla)) (Shaffer, Douglas) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Private Mediation (Joint Notice) filed by defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. and plaintiff Rene Maphumulo (Snyder, Barry) |
| Filing 17 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge David O. Carter: Scheduling Order to be issued. Court Reporter: CourtSmart; Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Lewman; Plaintiff Attorney: Matthew L. Taylor; Defendant Attorney: Barry Clifford Snyder; Time in Court: :09. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (dgo) |
|
Filing 19
SCHEDULING ORDER & ORDER RE: PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES by Judge David O. Carter: Fact Discovery cut-off 5/18/2020, Expert Discovery cut-off 7/10/2020, Motion cut-off 6/29/2020 @ 8:30 AM, Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/3/2020 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter, Jury Trial set for 8/18/2020 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge David O. Carter. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. Private Mediator to be selected by 8/9/2019. (dgo)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Stipulation to Dismiss Additional Swift Entities #15 . Swift Transportation, Swift Transportation Co., Inc., Swift Transportation Services, LLC, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. and Swift Leasing Co. terminated. (twdb)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION to Dismiss defendants Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc., Swift Transportation, Swift Transportation Services, LLC, Swift Leasing Co., Swift Transportation Co., Inc. filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc., Swift Transportation, Swift Transportation Services, LLC, Swift Leasing Co., Swift Transportation Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Dismissing Additional Swift Entities)(Attorney Barry Clifford Snyder added to party Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Barry Clifford Snyder added to party Swift Leasing Co.(pty:dft), Attorney Barry Clifford Snyder added to party Swift Transportation(pty:dft), Attorney Barry Clifford Snyder added to party Swift Transportation Co., Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Barry Clifford Snyder added to party Swift Transportation Services, LLC(pty:dft))(Snyder, Barry) |
| Filing 14 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT REPORT filed by Defendants Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc., Swift Leasing Co., Swift Transportation, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Co., Inc., Swift Transportation Services, LLC. (Snyder, Barry) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint, as to defendant Hugh William McEntyer. (twdb) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Rene E Maphumulo. (Taylor, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request as to Amended Complaint #10 . The following error(s) was found: The summons request page 3 has Does 1 to 10. The Amended Complaint #1-1 page 8 is missing Does 1 to 10, RE: Names of additional defendants. The names must match. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (twdb) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Rene E Maphumulo. (Taylor, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY filed by Plaintiff Rene E Maphumulo (Taylor, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, RE INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER served on June 17, 2019. (Snyder, Barry) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 7/29/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
|
Filing 6
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge David O. Carter. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-01109-DOC (SHKx). (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S UNVERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/13/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 2 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 .(et) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc., Hugh William McEntyer, Swift Leasing Co., Swift Transportation, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Swift Transportation Co., Inc., Swift Transportation Services, LLC, Does 1 through 10, Inclusive. amending Notice of Removal #1 , filed by Plaintiff Rene E Maphumulo [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/22/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 .(et) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, (Snyder, Barry) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Snyder, Barry) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino, case number CIVDS1908623 Receipt No: 0973-23926012 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Proof of Service) (Attorney Barry Clifford Snyder added to party Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC(pty:dft))(Snyder, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
