Isabella Mathy v. Cash Central of California, LLC, et al
Isabella Mathy |
CASH CENTRAL OF CALIFORNIA, LLC and Transunion LLC |
5:2019cv02058 |
October 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
John A Kronstadt |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/6/2020. (ake) |
Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by dEFENDANT Transunion LLC.(Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 18 ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT CASH CENTRAL OF CALIFORNIA, LLC TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) #17 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs complaint is extended to December 26, 2019. (lom) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Cash Central of California, LLC answer now due 12/26/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Cash Central of California, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order granting Extension of time for defendant Cash Central of CA, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiffs complaint)(Racek, Edward) |
Filing 16 ORDER RE AGREED STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT CASH CENTRAL OF CALIFORNIA, LLC TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DKT. #15 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. the Stipulation is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant Cash Central of California, LLC to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. 1) is extended to 12/12/2019. (jp) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Cash Central of California, LLC answer now due 12/12/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Cash Central of California, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Edward W Racek added to party Cash Central of California, LLC(pty:dft))(Racek, Edward) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Transunion LLC, identifying Trans Union Intermediate Holdings, Inc.,. (Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Transunion LLC answer now due 12/12/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Transunion LLC.(Attorney Jennifer Bergh added to party Transunion LLC(pty:dft))(Bergh, Jennifer) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Isabella Mathy, upon Defendant Transunion LLC served on 10/31/2019, answer due 11/21/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lynanne Gares, Litigation Services Manager in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Le, Sylvanna Uyen) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Isabella Mathy, upon Defendant Cash Central of California, LLC served on 11/5/2019, answer due 11/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Barbara Bacon, Paralegal in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Le, Uyen) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake) |
Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:19-cv-02058 JAK(SHKx). (rn) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Transunion LLC. (esa) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Cash Central of California, LLC. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Isabella Mathy. (Le, Sylvanna Uyen) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Isabella Mathy, (Le, Sylvanna Uyen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Isabella Mathy. (Le, Sylvanna Uyen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24676804 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Isabella Mathy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C) (Attorney Sylvanna Uyen Le added to party Isabella Mathy(pty:pla))(Le, Sylvanna Uyen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.