Julian Rojas et al v. Vivint Solar, Inc., et al
| Julian Rojas and Juan Huerta |
| Does 1-10, inclusive and Vivint Solar, Inc. |
| 5:2019cv02297 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Vivint Solar, Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Juan Huerta, Plaintiff Julian Rojas. (Rinka, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Juan Huerta, Julian Rojas, identifying Vivint Solar, Inc.. (Rinka, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs Juan Huerta, Julian Rojas. (Rinka, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24871415 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Juan Huerta, Julian Rojas. (Attorney Stephen M Rinka added to party Juan Huerta(pty:bkmov), Attorney Stephen M Rinka added to party Julian Rojas(pty:pla))(Rinka, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
