James Rutherford v. Chih-Hong Young et al
| James Rutherford |
| CHIH-HONG YOUNG and RULING LIU YOUNG; as co-trustees or their successors in trust, under THE YOUNG FAMILY TRUST, dated December 15, 1993 and any amendments thereto, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Ruling Liu Young, Does 1-10, inclusive and Chih-Hong Young |
| 5:2020cv00904 |
| April 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Granting #15 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 9/7/2020. (gk)
|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Chih-Hong Young, Ruling Liu Young, identifying Young Family Trust. (Kasai, Wayne) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Chih-Hong Young, Ruling Liu Young. (Attorney Wayne T Kasai added to party Chih-Hong Young(pty:dft), Attorney Wayne T Kasai added to party Ruling Liu Young(pty:dft)) (Kasai, Wayne) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff James Rutherford, upon Defendant Chih-Hong Young served on 5/14/2020, answer due 6/4/2020; Ruling Liu Young served on 5/14/2020, answer due 6/4/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hashemi, Babak) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint #11 . Having reviewed and considered Plaintiffs response to the Courts Order to Show Cause #12 , the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim. The Court therefore dismisses the state law claim without prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Rutherfordto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Babak Hashemi, #2 Declaration of Plaintiff)(Hashemi, Babak) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Dolly M. Gee. In light of the foregoing, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by May 11, 2020. (lom)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Chih-Hong Young, Ruling Liu Young. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff James Rutherford, (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Hashemi, Babak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26247619 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Rutherford. (Attorney Babak Hashemi added to party James Rutherford(pty:pla))(Hashemi, Babak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
