Andre Marvin Jennings v. People of the State of Riverside CA
| Andre Marvin Jennings |
| People of the State of Riverside CA |
| 5:2020cv00971 |
| May 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Otis D Wright |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Petitioner Andre Marvin Jennings of Text verification receipt from the attorney. (hr) |
Filing 16
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME #14 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Petitioner has no filing obligations at this time; therefore, his request for an extension is premature. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 15 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Andre Marvin Jennings. (rn) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Extension of Time filed by Petitioner Andre Marvin Jennings. (hr) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia on behalf of Respondent People of the State of Riverside CA (Attorney Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia added to party People of the State of Riverside CA(pty:res))(Chenelia, Kristen) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Within 14 days of the date of this order, Respondent shall file and serve a notice of appearance. (see document for further details). Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, Part 1, #2 Petition, Part 2, #3 Petition, Part 3, #4 Petition, Part 4, #5 Petition, Part 5, #6 Petitioner's Consent Form) (hr)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #10 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (hr)
|
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Petitioner Andre Marvin Jennings. (hr) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Manual Filing/Lodging filed by Petitioner Andre Marvin Jennings of Audio Recording. (hr) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM/BRIEF in Response to Order to Show Cause #4 filed by Petitioner Andre Marvin Jennings (hr) |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS against Respondent People of the State of Riverside CA amending Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 , filed by Petitioner Andre Marvin Jennings(hr) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CASSETTE TAPE RECEIVED BY PETITIONER ON 5/5/20; RE: Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order #5 ; RETURNED TO PETITIONER ON 5/14/2020. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gr) |
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, ORDERING Petitioner cassette tape submitted by Petitioner Andre Marvin Jennings, received on 5/5/20, is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: There is no notice of lodging, no face page on the envelope. (hr)
|
|
Filing 4
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Petitioner is therefore ORDERED TOSHOW CAUSE no later than May 28, 2020 why the Petition should not be dismissed. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank State Habeas Petition Form, #2 CV-60 Form, #3 Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Andre Marvin Jennings. (et) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson.(Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE.), filed by Petitioner Andre Marvin Jennings. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Andre Marvin Jennings v. People of the State of Riverside CA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Andre Marvin Jennings | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: People of the State of Riverside CA | |
| Represented By: | Kristen Kinnaird Chenelia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
