Richard Dickerson v. Transunion LLC et al
| Richard Dickerson |
| TransUnion, LLC and TD Bank USA, N.A. |
| 5:2020cv01287 |
| June 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Sheri Pym |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (DKT. #13 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. TD Bank shall have up to and including 9/9/2020 to file aresponse to Plaintiff's complaint. (et)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Christopher Todd Norris added to party TD Bank USA, N.A.(pty:dft))(Norris, Christopher) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/18/2020. (cw)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant TransUnion, LLC, identifying TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc.. (Marker, Kristin) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant TransUnion, LLC.(Attorney Kristin L Marker added to party TransUnion, LLC(pty:dft))(Marker, Kristin) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (vcr)
|
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Richard Dickerson, upon Defendant TD Bank USA, N.A. served on 6/29/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dawn Mitchell in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Angelo, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants TD Bank USA, N.A., TransUnion, LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Richard Lee Dickerson. (Angelo, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Richard Lee Dickerson, (Angelo, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Richard Lee Dickerson. (Angelo, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26972561 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Richard Lee Dickerson. (Attorney Joseph Brian Angelo added to party Richard Lee Dickerson(pty:pla))(Angelo, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
