Richard Hart et al v. Stephanie Clendenin et al
| Richard Hart, Aldo Hernandez, Graham Waldrop, Ervin Longstreet and Charles Gluck |
| Stephanie Clendenin and Janine Wallace |
| 5:2020cv01559 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendants Stephanie Clendenin, Janine Wallace. upon Janine Wallace waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/12/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Lisa Tillman. (Tillman, Lisa) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendants Stephanie Clendenin, Janine Wallace. upon Stephanie Clendenin waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/12/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Lisa Tillman. (Tillman, Lisa) |
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 5:18-cv-02604 JGB (SHKx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:20-cv-01559 JGB (SHKx). Signed by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani (esa)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Stephanie Clendenin. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Janine Wallace. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiffs Charles Gluck, Richard Hart, Aldo Hernandez, Ervin Longstreet, Graham Waldrop. Related Case(s): 19-cv-01546-JGB (SHKx); 08:20-cv-00835-JGB (SHKx); 2:20-cv-4450-CBM (PVC); 5:20-cv-00768-JTH (PVC); 20-cv-00605-TJH (AFMx); 2:20-cv-03172-ODW (MRWx) (Choe, Samantha) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Charles Gluck, Richard Hart, Aldo Hernandez, Ervin Longstreet, Graham Waldrop. (Choe, Samantha) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Charles Gluck, Richard Hart, Aldo Hernandez, Ervin Longstreet, Graham Waldrop. (Choe, Samantha) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Choe, Samantha) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Charles Gluck, Richard Hart, Aldo Hernandez, Ervin Longstreet, Graham Waldrop. (Choe, Samantha) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-27510027 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Richard Hart, Charles Gluck, Aldo Hernandez, Ervin Longstreet, Graham Waldrop. (Attorney Samantha J Choe added to party Charles Gluck(pty:pla), Attorney Samantha J Choe added to party Richard Hart(pty:pla), Attorney Samantha J Choe added to party Aldo Hernandez(pty:pla), Attorney Samantha J Choe added to party Ervin Longstreet(pty:pla), Attorney Samantha J Choe added to party Graham Waldrop(pty:pla))(Choe, Samantha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
