Mary Ann Desilveria Davidson v. Ford Motor Company, et al
Plaintiff: Mary Ann Desilveria Davidson
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Jack Gosch Ford, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2020cv01965
Filed: September 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Referring Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Nature of Suit: Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 Filing 10 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Riverside Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Riverside Superior Court. (iv)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The above-captioned action shall be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside, 30755-D Auld Road, Murrieta, CA 92563 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Scheduling Conference set for 1/14/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
October 1, 2020 Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 23, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
September 23, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:20-cv-01965 FMO (SHKx). (esa)
September 23, 2020 COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Ford Motor Company. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 4)(esa)
September 21, 2020 COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Mary Ann Desilveria Davidson, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 8/21/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 3) (esa)
September 21, 2020 COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Ford Motor Company, Jack Gosch Ford, Inc., Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Mary Ann Desilveria Davidson. (filed in state court 8/5/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2) (esa)
September 21, 2020 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on 09/21/2020. (Shields, Robert)
September 21, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Shields, Robert)
September 21, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Shields, Robert)
September 21, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number MCC2001490 Receipt No: ACACDC-28176014 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit Decl. Ex. A - Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit Decl. Ex. B - POS on Ford, #4 Exhibit Decl. Ex. C Answer, #5 Exhibit Decl. Ex. D - All Other Pleadings) (Attorney Robert A Shields added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Shields, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mary Ann Desilveria Davidson v. Ford Motor Company, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Robert A Shields
Represented By: David Michael Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Gosch Ford, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Ann Desilveria Davidson
Represented By: Christopher Michael Lovasz
Represented By: Jacob A. Bolz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?