American Freightways, L.P. v. Ernester Morfin Orozco et al
| American Freightways, L.P. |
| Ernester Morfin Orozco, Natos Truck And Trailer Repair, Inc., Honorato Ramirez, Honorato Ramirez an individual doing business as Natos Truck And Trailer Repair, Ernester Morfin Orozco an individual doing business as Morfins Trucking and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2020cv02551 |
| December 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Sheri Pym |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 81 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff American Freightways, L.P.. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Jeffries, Kathleen) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff American Freightways, L.P., upon Defendant Natos Truck And Trailer Repair, Inc. served on 1/1/2021, answer due 1/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nato's Truck and Trailer Repair, Inc., a former California corporation in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jeffries, Kathleen) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff American Freightways, L.P., upon Defendant Honorato Ramirez served on 1/1/2021, answer due 1/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Honorato Ramirez, an individual doing business as Nato's Truck and Trailer Repair in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jeffries, Kathleen) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff American Freightways, L.P., upon Defendant Ernester Morfin Orozco served on 12/28/2020, answer due 1/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ernester Morfin Orozco, an individual doing business as Morfins Trucking in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jeffries, Kathleen) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Natos Truck And Trailer Repair, Inc., Ernester Morfin Orozco and Honorato Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Ramirez, #2 Orozco) (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff American Freightways, L.P., (Jeffries, Kathleen) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff American Freightways, L.P.. (Jeffries, Kathleen) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff American Freightways, L.P.. (Jeffries, Kathleen) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff American Freightways, L.P.. (Jeffries, Kathleen) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff American Freightways, L.P.. (Jeffries, Kathleen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-29460535 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff American Freightways, L.P.. (Attorney Kathleen Collins Jeffries added to party American Freightways, L.P.(pty:pla))(Jeffries, Kathleen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
