In re Anibal Mesala Silva
| Anibal Mesala Silva |
| Rod Danielson |
| Anibal Silva |
| 5:2020cv02587 |
| December 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (esa) |
| Filing 4 U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit Notice of Transfer of Appeal to District Court. Receipt acknowledged by U.S. District Court on 12/16/20. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 12/1/20. (esa) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT OF ELECTION TO TRANSFER APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT filed by Appellee Rod Danielson. (esa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL Re: Tentative ruling of Trustee's Verified Motion for Waiver of LBR 3015-1(j) entered on 11/30/20 by Bankruptcy Judge Scott Yun, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 12/1/20. Bankruptcy Court case number: 6:19-bk-10026 SY, Adversary number: NA, BAP case number: cc-20-1266., filed by appellant Anibal Silva. (Attachments: #1 BAP Dkt) (esa) Modified on 12/16/2020 (esa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
