Michelle Ramirez v. Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino et al
Plaintiff: Michelle Ramirez
Defendant: Judge Arthur A. Harrison and Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino
Case Number: 5:2021cv00057
Filed: January 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John W Holcomb
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2021 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Statement for ADR (2 pages) & CV-40 (Proof of Service) upon Orbach Huff Suarez & Henderson LLP, filed by Plaintiff Michelle Ramirez, served on 1/27/21. (hr)
January 29, 2021 Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: denying #3 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to. In light of the ODLA and the Complaint's deficiencies identified in the ODLA, this Court DENIES the Application without prejudice. Should Plaintiff decide to file a First Amended Complaint to cure the deficiencies discussed in the ODLA, then Plaintiff may file another application to stay the case at that time. (dc)
January 29, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: The case is now a Report and Recommendation case. It has been referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, who will consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate and necessary. The case number is 5:21-cv-00057 JWH (SHK). (esa)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Attachments: #1 Blank CV Rights Form, #2 Notice of Dismiss) (dc)
January 27, 2021 Filing 11 Opposition re: APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #3 filed by Defendants Arthur A. Harrison, Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Attorney Kevin E Gilbert added to party Arthur A. Harrison(pty:dft), Attorney Kevin E Gilbert added to party Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino(pty:dft))(Gilbert, Kevin)
January 22, 2021 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Michelle Ramirez, upon Defendant Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino served on 1/21/2021, answer due 2/11/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon (Superior Clerks Office refused to accept), Denaya "Clerk"/Lisa "Supervisor", Other: Court Executive Office, 247 W. Third Street, Eleventh Floor, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0302. Original Summons NOT returned. (hr)
January 20, 2021 Filing 10 Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Arthur A. Harrison, Judge. (yl)
January 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
January 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
January 20, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR Re: Summons attached to Complaint #1 . Summons prepared for issuance prematurely. A new and corrected summons may be issued at the appropriate time. (esa)
January 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: granting #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (hr)
January 12, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
January 12, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa)
January 12, 2021 Filing 3 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by plaintiff Michelle Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 lodged proposed order) (esa)
January 12, 2021 Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by plaintiff Michelle Ramirez. (esa)
January 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendants Arthur A. Harrison, Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino.Case assigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani., filed by plaintiff Michelle Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 CV 71, #2 Summons) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michelle Ramirez v. Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Judge Arthur A. Harrison
Represented By: Kevin E Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino
Represented By: Kevin E Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Ramirez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?