Natasha Scoggins v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
| Natasha Scoggins |
| Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., Ryder Systems, Inc., Ryder System, Inc. and Does 1 through 50 |
| 5:2021cv00076 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John W Holcomb |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John W. Holcomb. Scheduling Conference set for 4/9/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
|
| Filing 10 STATEMENT Consent to Proceed Before US Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Natasha Scoggins (Appleton, Heather) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF INITIAL STANDING ORDER filed by Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.. (De Leon, Lara) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendants Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Natasha Scoggins, upon Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. served on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Corporate Creations Network, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/23/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., Ryder System, Inc., Ryder Systems, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Natasha Scoggins. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/16/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.. Related Case(s): N/A (De Leon, Lara) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., identifying Natasha Scoggins; Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.; Ryder System, Inc.. (De Leon, Lara) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. identifying Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., a subsidiary of Ryder System, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (De Leon, Lara) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.. (De Leon, Lara) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVDS2022430 Receipt No: ACACDC-30071317 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Proof of Service, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Assignment, #5 Exhibit E - Summons Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., #6 Exhibit F - Summons Ryder System, Inc., #7 Exhibit G - Summons Ryder Systems, Inc., #8 Exhibit H - Notice of Trial Setting Conference, #9 Exhibit I - Answer to Complaint, #10 Declaration of Peggy Hinkle in Support of Removal, #11 Declaration of Delores Clark in Support of Removal) (Attorney Lara Cardin De Leon added to party Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.(pty:dft))(De Leon, Lara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
