Geodel Shiela Nelson v. Victorias Secret Stores, LLC et al
| Geodel Shiela Nelson |
| Victorias Secret Stores, LLC, L Brands, Inc. and Does 1 to 25 |
| 5:2021cv01275 |
| July 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| James V Selna |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
MINUTES [IN CHAMBERS] Order Regarding Motion for Remand by Judge James V. Selna: Plaintiff Geodel Shiela Nelson ("Nelson") moved to remand this action to San Bernadino Superior Court. Dkt. No. #13 . Defendant Victoria's Secret Stores ("Victoria's Secret") opposes the motion. Dkt. No. #15 . Nelson then filed her reply. Dkt. No. #16 . For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the motion. The hearing noticed for September 27, 2021, is also ordered VACATED. [See document for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 16 REPLY in Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #13 filed by Plaintiff Geodel Shiela Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of M. Hernandez ISO Plaintiff's Reply, #2 Exhibit A-Email Correspondence, #3 Exhibit B-Email Correspondence, #4 Exhibit C-Email Correspondence, #5 Exhibit D-Email Correspondence)(Hernandez, Michael) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #13 CIVSB2112523 filed by Defendant Victorias Secret Stores, LLC. (Shinder, David) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice and Acknowledgment of Service (CV-21) Executed, #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT-CIVIL was e-filed using the wrong form. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Geodel Shiela Nelson. Motion set for hearing on 9/27/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Michael Hernandez, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Evidentiary Objections) (Hernandez, Michael) |
| Filing 12 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Geodel Shiela Nelson Geodel Shiela Nelson, identifying None other than the parties. (Hernandez, Michael) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Geodel Shiela Nelson, upon Defendant Victorias Secret Stores, LLC acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 7/29/2021, answer due 8/19/2021. Acknowledgment of Service signed by David J. Shinder, Attorney. (Hernandez, Michael) |
|
Filing 10
Order Setting Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference for October 18, 2021 at 10:00 am before Judge James V. Selna. Counsel shall file the Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report, with the completed Exhibit A, by October 11, 2021. (kdu)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Victorias Secret Stores, LLC, (Shinder, David) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge James V. Selna. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:21-cv-01275 JVS (SHKx). (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been reassigned to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. New Case Number 5:21-cv-1275 JWH (SHKx). (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 25, L Brands, Inc., Victorias Secret Stores, LLC.,filed by plaintiff Geodel Shiela Nelson. (ghap) |
| REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL as to L Brands, Inc. without prejudice filed by plaintiff Geodel Shiela Nelson. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/28/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D, PAGE 000028)(ghap) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC. (Shinder, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino, case number CIVSB2112523 Receipt No: ACACDC-31710932 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit) (Attorney David J Shinder added to party Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC(pty:dft))(Shinder, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
