Jose Hernandez v. B.M. Transport, Inc. et al
| Jose Hernandez |
| B.M. Transport, Inc., Jesse Zane Jepson and Does 1-50 |
| 5:2021cv01404 |
| August 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2021 at 10:30 a.m. See Order for details. (mku)
|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #13 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Jesse Zane Jepson.(Attorney Sophia S DeFrancis added to party Jesse Zane Jepson(pty:dft))(DeFrancis, Sophia) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JESSE ZANE JEPSON'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. #12 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (1) The Motion is GRANTED. (2) Plaintiff must file an Amended Complaint on or before September 20, 2021. The deadline for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is extended up to and including 10/4/2021. (jp)
|
| Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery) JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff Jose Hernandez(Cutting, Stacey) |
| Filing 12 Corrected NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Jesse Zane Jepson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Griffin, John) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form,, #10 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer #9 by Courtroom Deputy Clerk to Judge Josephine L. Staton. (1) The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by 9/3/2021. (2) Counsel shall re-file the entire Stipulation properly and pursuant to the Court's Procedures. Proposed Order should be filed as an attachment to the efiled stipulation and e-mailed as a Worddocument to Judge Josephine L. Staton generic email addresses (JLS_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov). (jp) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. (2) Proposed Order shall be filed as separate attachment to the e-filed "NOTICE OF LODGING and/or Motion" and e-mailed to a Judge Staton generic email addresses a Microsoft Word version of the document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 9 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 8/30/2021, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #11 ] - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 10/4/2021 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Jesse Zane Jepson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Certificate of Service (POS)) (Griffin, John). Modified on 8/30/2021 (jp). |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Jesse Zane Jepson, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #7 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 , Notice of Reassignment of Eastern Division Removal Case (CV-106) - optional html form, #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 , Complaint - (Discovery), Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on 08/20/2021. (Griffin, John) |
| Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Josephine L. Staton. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:21-cv-01404 JLS (KKx). (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Jesse Zane Jepson, identifying Defendant B.M. Transport, Inc. and Plaintiff Jose Hernandez. (Griffin, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Jesse Zane Jepson. (Griffin, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino, case number CIVSB2102015 Receipt No: ACACDC-31836836 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Jesse Zane Jepson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of John T. Griffin, #2 Exhibit A to Decl. of JTG, #3 Declaration of Jesse Zane Jepson) (Attorney John T Griffin added to party Jesse Zane Jepson(pty:dft))(Griffin, John) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants B.M. Transport, Inc., Does 1 to 50, Jesse Zane Jepson., filed by plaintiff Jose Hernandez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/28/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
