Hadi Melhem v. FCA US LLC et al
| HADI MELHEM |
| FCA US LLC, Triangle Motors, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 5:2021cv01745 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Tionna Dolin counsel for Plaintiff Hadi Melhem. Karin Kuemerle is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Hadi Melhem. (Dolin, Tionna)
|
|
Filing 28
Receipt of Remand by Riverside County Superior Court, per filed stamp on 1/14/2022 (lc)
|
|
Filing 27
TRANSMITTAL of documents to RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, NO. CVRI2101861 (lc)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS) #12 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The amount in controversy is not clear from the face of the Complaint. Defendant fails to present evidence establishing beyond speculation that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Accordingly, Defendant has not shown the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the case. Case Remanded to Riverside County Superior Court No. VRI2101861. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lc)
|
|
Filing 25
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel A Law counsel for Plaintiff Hadi Melhem. Simi Peterson is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Hadi Melhem. (Law, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 24
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION (ECF No. #12 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion to Remand (ECF No. #12 ) and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matter can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion(s), noticed for hearing on December 20, 2021, has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
|
Filing 23
Request to Appear At Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Via Telephone or Zoom filed by Defendant FCA US LLC re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside #12 (Shepardson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 22
REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside #12 filed by Plaintiff Hadi Melhem. (Law, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than August 15, 2022. (smo)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/24/2022 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 11/8/2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. See document for additional pretrial dates and deadlines. (smo)
|
|
Filing 19
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report with respect to the Scheduling Conference and has concluded that the hearing on December 6, 2021 is not necessary. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
|
Filing 18
OPPOSITION in opposition to re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside #12 filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Scott S. Shepardson)(Shepardson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Notice of Appearance #14 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The document is accepted as filed. (smo)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
|
|
Filing 15
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Hadi Melhem.. (Peterson, Simi)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Simi Peterson on behalf of Plaintiff Hadi Melhem (Attorney Simi Peterson added to party Hadi Melhem(pty:pla))(Peterson, Simi)
|
|
Filing 13
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside #12 filed by Plaintiff Hadi Melhem. (Attorney Daniel A Law added to party Hadi Melhem(pty:pla))(Law, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside filed by Plaintiff Hadi Melhem. Motion set for hearing on 12/20/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, #3 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Remand) (Kuemerle, Karin)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Karin Kuemerle on behalf of Plaintiff Hadi Melhem (Attorney Karin Kuemerle added to party Hadi Melhem(pty:pla))(Kuemerle, Karin)
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #7 , Notice of Reassignment of Eastern Division Removal Case (CV-106) - optional html form, #4 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #8 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 served on October 19, 2021. (Shepardson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on October 18, 2021. (Shepardson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 12/6/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (vv)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (vv)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge John W. Holcomb and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:21-cv-01745 MCS (SPx). (car)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Browning Dodge Chrysler Jeep Ram, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, FCA US LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Hadi Melhem. Filed in State Court on 4/1/2021 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
|
|
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Hadi Melhem pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Triangle Motors, Inc. dba Browning Dodge Chrysler Jeep without prejudice. Filed in State Court on 10/2/2020 Submitted with Exhibit B attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 10/18/2021 (car). (car).
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. Filed in State Court on 6/1/2021 Submitted with Exhibit F Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Triangle Motors, Inc. Filed in State Court on 6/2/2021 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit G to Notice of Removal #1 .(Attorney Rochelle Lillian Smith added to party Triangle Motors, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Scott Steven Shepardson added to party Triangle Motors, Inc.(pty:dft))(car)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, (Shepardson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Shepardson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number CVRI2101861 Receipt No: ACACDC-32159053 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Scott S. Shepardson, #2 Declaration of Rochelle L. Smith) (Attorney Scott Steven Shepardson added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft))(Shepardson, Scott)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
