A.L.S. et al v. County of San Bernardino
A.L.S. and G.V.S. |
County of San Bernardino and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
DEBORAH CURIEL |
5:2022cv00071 |
January 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Sheri Pym |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 as to Defendant County of San Bernardino. (jtil) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #2 filed by Plaintiff A.L.S.. (Dunn, Brian) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF A.L.S., (Dunn, Brian) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($ 402.00 paid on 01/11/2022, Receipt ACACDC-32608210 filed by Plaintiff A.L.S. (Attorney Brian T Dunn added to party A.L.S.(pty:pla))(Dunn, Brian) Modified by Clerk on 1/12/2022 (jtil). |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff A.L.S.. (Dunn, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.