Xiaoxia Liu v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Xiaoxia Liu |
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, David Radel, Alejandro Mayorkas and Does 1-10 |
5:2022cv01461 |
August 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (et) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Xiaoxia Liu. (Shen, Chunping) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Xiaoxia Liu, (Shen, Chunping) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Xiaoxia Liu. (Shen, Chunping) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33837185 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Xiaoxia Liu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Chunping Shen added to party Xiaoxia Liu(pty:pla))(Shen, Chunping) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.