Fred Paciocco et al v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc. et al
| Fred Paciocco and Sandra Paciocco |
| Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| Atlas Van Lines, Inc. and ACE Relocation Systems, Inc. |
| 5:2022cv01900 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court GRANTS the parties' Stipulation #10 , Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants Atlas Van Lines, Inc. and ACE Relocation Systems, Inc., including all causes of action alleged therein, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
|
| Filing 10 First STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to settlement filed by Defendant Atlas Van Lines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Garfinkel, Gregg) |
| Filing 9 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Respond/Plead as to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioners/Defendants ACE Relocation Systems, Inc., Atlas Van Lines, Inc..(Garfinkel, Gregg) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 7 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants ACE Relocation Systems, Inc., Atlas Van Lines, Inc., (Garfinkel, Gregg) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case and Notice re Consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 21-01, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:22-cv-01900 AB (JCx). (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants ACE Relocation Systems, Inc., Atlas Van Lines, Inc., Does, filed by Plaintiffs Fred Paciocco, Sandra Paciocco. (FILED IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/9/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioners ACE Relocation Systems, Inc., Atlas Van Lines, Inc.. (Garfinkel, Gregg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVSB2209892 Receipt No: ACACDC-34227467 - Fee: $402, filed by Petitioners ACE Relocation Systems, Inc., Atlas Van Lines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint) (Attorney Gregg S Garfinkel added to party ACE Relocation Systems, Inc.(pty:pet), Attorney Gregg S Garfinkel added to party Atlas Van Lines, Inc.(pty:pet))(Garfinkel, Gregg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
