Lucia Santana v. Warden
5:2023cv01406 |
February 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Judge Wesley L. Hsu, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 16 Pursuant to the Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es) |
Filing 13 MINUTES (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Regarding Petitioner's Failure to File Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by March 6, 2024 why the Court should not recommend that the lawsuit be dismissed for failure to file an opposition to the Motion, failure to comply with Court orders, and failure to prosecute. If Petitioner files an opposition to the Motion on or before that date, the Order to Show Cause will be discharged, and no additional action need be taken. [See document for further information.] (es) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lucia Santana v. Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.