Brandi Danielle Adamik v. Martin J. O'Malley
| Brandi Danielle Adamik |
| Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. O'Malley |
| 5:2024cv00068 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner GRANTING REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) #2 . (jp)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (sh)
|
|
Filing 4
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brandi Danielle Adamik. (Kuntz, William)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brandi Danielle Adamik, identifying United States of America and Social Security Administration. (Kuntz, William)
|
|
Filing 2
REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Brandi Danielle Adamik. (Kuntz, William)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Brandi Danielle Adamik. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney William M Kuntz added to party Brandi Danielle Adamik(pty:pla))(Kuntz, William)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
