Joyce Shelton et al v. United States of America
Joyce Shelton and C. S. |
United States of America |
5:2024cv00087 |
January 16, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Sheri Pym |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant United States of America. (sh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff CS (Minor), Joyce Shelton, (Barthel, Gary) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff CS (Minor), Joyce Shelton. (Barthel, Gary) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs CS (Minor), Joyce Shelton. (Barthel, Gary) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36730901 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Joyce Shelton, CS (Minor). (Attorney Gary Stephen Barthel added to party CS (Minor)(pty:pla), Attorney Gary Stephen Barthel added to party Joyce Shelton(pty:pla))(Barthel, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.