Juan Wu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Juan Wu |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and David Radel |
5:2025cv00302 |
February 4, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Juan Wu. (et) |
Filing 4 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant David Radel. (et) |
Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Merrick Garland. (et) |
Filing 2 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Civil Process Clerk). (et) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS against Defendants Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Filing fee $ 405 PAID.), filed by Plaintiff Juan Wu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.