Lakeith Leroy McCoy v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
Plaintiff: Lakeith Leroy McCoy
Defendant: California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Christian Pfeiffer, Riverside County Sheriff's Department and Does 1 through 99, inclusive, in their individual and official capacities
Case Number: 5:2025cv00516
Filed: February 22, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: R Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2025 Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: Order Withdrawing Report [Dkt. 8] and Granting a 30-day Extension to Respond to Screening Order [Dkt. 6]. Plaintiff's Request (Dkt. 9) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have an additional 30-days, that is, until April 24, 2025, to select one of the options in the Screening Order and file the document required by that option. Plaintiff is reminded that failing to do so could result in dismissal of the action. Based on the foregoing, the Report (Dkt. 8) is WITHDRAWN. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See document for details). (aro)
March 28, 2025 Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE issued by Magistrate Judge John D. Early re Complaint #1 : This Report and Recommendation is submitted to the Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge, under 28 U.S.C. 636 and General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. IT IS THERFORE RECOMMENDED that the District Judge issue an order: (1) approving and accepting this Report and Recommendation; and (2) directing that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice except for claims against Christian Pfeiffer, Warden at Kern Valley State Prison, which are dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff to pursuing any such claim in the appropriate venue, with the Court finding dismissal, not transfer, is warranted here. See 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). (kh)
March 28, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Objections to R&R due by 4/17/2025. (kh)
March 25, 2025 Filing 9 FIRST APPLICATION for Extension of Time filed by Plaintiff Lakeith Leroy McCoy. (et)
March 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early: Order Regarding Complaint. The Complaint appears subject to dismissal. Accordingly, the Court provides Plaintiff with several options regarding how to proceed. Within twenty-one (21) days of this Order, Plaintiff must choose one of the following options and file the document required by that option. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Blank Dismissal Form, #2 Blank Civil Rights Complaint) (aro)
February 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING REQUST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE) #2 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (lc)
February 28, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) Modified on 3/28/2025 (mba). Modified on 3/31/2025 (mba).
February 22, 2025 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lakeith Leroy McCoy (car)
February 22, 2025 Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Lakeith Leroy McCoy. (car)
February 22, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Lakeith Leroy McCoy. (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/28/2025: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lakeith Leroy McCoy v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lakeith Leroy McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christian Pfeiffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Riverside County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 99, inclusive, in their individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?