Chester Young v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Chester Young
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 5:2025cv00717
Filed: March 19, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David T Bristow
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1402 Medical Malpractice
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (kd)
March 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 23-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:25-cv-00717 JLS (DTBx). (lh)
March 20, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties identifying Dept of Veterans Affairs. (Harris, Scott)
March 20, 2025 Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chester Young. (Harris, Scott)
March 19, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 2 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings and select Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71). In the future please e-file the Summons separately and under its own event category. The summons has been issued.. (car)
March 19, 2025 Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States of America. (car)
March 19, 2025 Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
March 19, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
March 19, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (car)
March 19, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-39329584 - Fee: $405. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet) (Attorney Scott Spencer Harris added to party Chester Young(pty:pla))(Harris, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chester Young v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chester Young
Represented By: Scott Spencer Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?