Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Netcom Technologies Inc
| Administrative Maintenance Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor Management Cooperation Committee and Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan |
| Netcom Technologies Inc |
| 8:2008cv00898 |
| October 14, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Marc L. Goldman |
| James V. Selna |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Employee Pension Plan |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, in favor of Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan against Netcom Technologies Inc Related to: Stipulation for Judgment, 7 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
