Marisela Rosales v. Taco Bell Corp et al
| 8:2009cv01290 |
| November 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Carney |
| Nakazato |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO REMAND by Judge Cormac J. Carney remanding case to ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Case number 00308331. (JS-6) (rla)
|
|
Filing
9
(In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE COURT by Judge Cormac J. Carney: The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Taco Bell to show cause as to why this case should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Taco Bell shall file a response to the Court's order to show cause by March 22, 2010. Ms. Rosales will then have until March 29, 2010, to file and serve her position. Upon the filing of Ms. Rosales' position, t he matter will stand submitted. The hearing on the motion to dismiss set for December 28, 2009, at 1:30 p.m. is hereby continued to April 12, 2010. The Court will vacate that hearing if it determines that this case must be remanded to state court. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marisela Rosales v. Taco Bell Corp et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
