Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Pension Plan et al v. Quality First Electric Inc
| Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Labor Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the National IBEW NECA Labor Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, The Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern IBEW NECA Health Trust Fund and The Contract Compliance Fund |
| Quality First Electric Inc |
| 8:2010cv00660 |
| May 18, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J. Carney |
| Arthur Nakazato |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney: The Court ORDERS plaintiff's counsel, to show cause in writing no later than October 11, 2010, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's filing a motion for entry of default judgment (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
