Dynaflex International v. Upstate Distributors Inc
Dynaflex International |
Upstate Distributors Inc |
8:2011cv00430 |
March 17, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Robert N. Block |
Cormac J. Carney |
Patent |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(i) by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs case is dismissed withoutprejudice to refiling. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dynaflex International v. Upstate Distributors Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dynaflex International | |
Represented By: | Clement Cheng |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Upstate Distributors Inc | |
Represented By: | Gregory M Krakau |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.