Dynaflex International v. Upstate Distributors Inc
Plaintiff: Dynaflex International
Defendant: Upstate Distributors Inc
Case Number: 8:2011cv00430
Filed: March 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge: Cormac J. Carney
Nature of Suit: Patent

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(i) by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs case is dismissed withoutprejudice to refiling. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dynaflex International v. Upstate Distributors Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dynaflex International
Represented By: Clement Cheng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Upstate Distributors Inc
Represented By: Gregory M Krakau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?