Julia A Rieve v. Coventry Health Care, Inc. et al
| Julia A. Rieve |
| Coventry Health Care, Inc. and Coventry Health Care Workers Compensation, Inc. |
| 8:2011cv01032 |
| July 12, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O. Carter |
| Marc L. Goldman |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
172
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: denying 128 Motion for Order for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal. (twdb)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUA SPONTE GRANTING IN PART SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF. (See document for details.) re 42 Motion for Summary Judgment: Defendants' M otion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's FLSA claim but DENIED as to Plaintiff's California state law overtime claim, wage statement claim, UCL claim, PAGA claim, and claims against CHC. Defendants' motion to dismiss all claims based on Plaintiff's alleged destruction of evidence is also DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court sua sponte GRANTS summary judgment for Plaintiff on the issue of whether she is exempt from coverage under California overtime laws. (rla)
|
|
Filing
86
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 40 : (See document for details.) Plaintiff must manually file the Second Amended Complaint by March 26, 2012. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
