Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Howard Systems Inc
| Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee |
| Howard Systems Inc |
| 8:2012cv01869 |
| October 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O. Carter |
| Marc L. Goldman |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Contract Compliance Fund, Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the National Electrical Benefit Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan against Howard Systems Inc (twdb)
|
|
Filing
6
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. Court orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than DECEMBER 10, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted dili gently: Defendant's answer to complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all parties who have not yet appeared in this action. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
