Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Plaintiff: Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute and Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
Defendant: Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2013cv01587
Filed: October 10, 2013
Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Guilford
Referring Judge: Douglas F. McCormick
Nature of Suit: Patent

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute
Represented By: Martin R Lueck
Represented By: David Martinez
Represented By: Matfhew B McFarlane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
Represented By: Martin R Lueck
Represented By: David Martinez
Represented By: Matfhew B McFarlane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan E Singer
Represented By: Geoffrey D Biegler
Represented By: Limin Zheng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.