Shapiro-Gilman-Shandler Co., Inc. v. Super Irvine, Inc. et al
| Shapiro-Gilman-Shandler Co., Inc. |
| Su Aryarad, Ali Aryarad, Mohammad Ariarad and Super Irvine, Inc. |
| 8:2014cv00102 |
| January 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| David O. Carter |
| Agriculture Acts |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Shapiro-Gilman-Shandler Co., Inc. against Super Irvine, Inc., Ali Aryarad, Mohammad Ariarad jointly and severally in the principal amount of $72,363.16, interest in the amount of $1,589.01, attorneys fees of $4,977.00, costs of $400.00 for a total judgment of $79,329.17. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 13 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
|
|
Filing
8
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: denying 3 Ex Parte Application for TRO and Setting Accelerated Briefing on Preliminary Injunction. The Court therefore schedules a hearing on the motion for February 3, 2014, at 8:30 a.m. Pla intiff is directed to serve Defendants with their filings in this case, as well as this order, no later than noon on January 24, 2014. Both parties may submit simultaneous briefing on the preliminary injunction issue, not to exceed 15 pages, on or before January 29, 2014. (twdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
