Daniel Escalona v. Amy Miller
Petitioner: Daniel Escalona
Warden: Amy Miller
Case Number: 8:2014cv01272
Filed: August 11, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Margaret A. Nagle
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder, Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 11 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
July 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 7/31/2015. (mz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel Escalona v. Amy Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Escalona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Warden: Amy Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?