Michael Richard Wentworth v. R. Madden
Petitioner: Michael Richard Wentworth
Respondent: R. Madden
Case Number: 8:2016cv00744
Filed: April 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Beverly Reid O'Connell
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, in favor of R. Madden against Michael Richard Wentworth Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 50 , Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), 1 . Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the respondent and against petitioner Michael Richard Wentworth. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Richard Wentworth v. R. Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: R. Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Richard Wentworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?